AP Human Geography Practice Quiz: The Green Revolution
Written by AP Content Team, Verified for 2026 AP Exams, Last updated: May 2026
Test your understanding with short quizzes. This quiz has 9 questions to check your progress.
Question 1 of 9
All Questions (9)
A) Organic fertilizers, crop rotation, and animal-powered plows
B) High-yield seeds, increased use of chemicals, and mechanized farming
C) Subsistence farming, seed saving, and traditional irrigation methods
D) Urban gardening, hydroponics, and permaculture
Correct Answer: B
The text explicitly states that the Green Revolution was 'characterized in agriculture by the use of high-yield seeds, increased use of chemicals, and mechanized farming.'
A) An increase in the global food supply
B) A decrease in the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers
C) The preservation of traditional agricultural practices
D) An improvement in soil health and water quality
Correct Answer: A
The text explains that the Green Revolution had consequences for the 'food supply.' The positive consequence was the increase in food production due to high-yield seeds and other technologies.
A) Widespread crop failures due to the new seed varieties
B) Decreased reliance on machinery in agriculture
C) Harmful effects on the environment
D) A reduction in the overall amount of food produced
Correct Answer: C
The text states that the Green Revolution had 'negative consequences for both human populations and the environment,' directly identifying environmental harm as a key drawback.
A) Pollution of water sources from agricultural runoff
B) Expansion of forests as less land was needed for farming
C) Increased soil fertility without any long-term drawbacks
D) A reduction in the need for irrigation systems
Correct Answer: A
The text identifies 'increased use of chemicals' as a key component and 'negative consequences for... the environment.' A logical inference is that these chemicals, such as fertilizers and pesticides, would run off into water systems, causing pollution.
A) It was a universally beneficial movement that solved food shortages without creating new problems.
B) It was a failed experiment that ultimately decreased the food supply and only harmed the environment.
C) It was a complex development with a dual legacy of increasing food production while also causing environmental damage.
D) It was primarily an environmental movement focused on sustainable agriculture in the developing world.
Correct Answer: C
This answer choice accurately reflects the text's statement that the Green Revolution had both 'positive and negative consequences' for food supply and the environment, capturing its complex nature.
A) The developed world
B) North America and Europe
C) The developing world
D) Eastern Europe
Correct Answer: C
The first point in the content explicitly mentions explaining the consequences 'in the developing world.'
A) Only positive consequences for the environment
B) Only negative consequences for the food supply
C) Both positive and negative consequences for human populations
D) No significant consequences for human populations
Correct Answer: C
The text states mechanized farming was a key characteristic of the Green Revolution, and that the revolution as a whole had 'positive and negative consequences for both human populations and the environment.' Therefore, mechanization contributed to this mixed outcome.
A) The use of high-yield seeds
B) Increased use of chemicals
C) A focus on traditional, organic farming
D) Mechanized farming
Correct Answer: C
The text lists high-yield seeds, increased chemical use, and mechanized farming as the characteristics. Traditional, organic farming is contrary to the principles of the Green Revolution described.
A) Increased food supply and improved environmental conditions
B) Mechanized farming and the decline of chemical use
C) Increased food supply and negative environmental consequences
D) High-yield seeds and the preservation of traditional farming
Correct Answer: C
The text establishes a clear trade-off: the Green Revolution led to positive consequences for the food supply but also had negative consequences for the environment. This directly supports the argument about unintended trade-offs from technological advancements.