AP U.S. Government and Politics Practice Quiz: Checks on the Judicial Branch
Written by AP Content Team, Verified for 2026 AP Exams, Last updated: May 2026
Test your understanding with short quizzes. This quiz has 13 questions to check your progress.
Question 1 of 13
All Questions (13)
A) interpret and potentially invalidate laws made by elected branches.
B) propose and ratify new Constitutional amendments.
C) confirm or reject presidential appointments to lower courts.
D) enforce its own rulings without the help of the executive branch.
Correct Answer: A
The provided content states that 'the exercise of judicial review can lead to debate about the Supreme Court's power.' This debate arises because judicial review involves the Court's ability to invalidate legislative or executive acts, which are actions taken by the popularly elected branches of government.
A) Judicial activism
B) Judicial review
C) Judicial restraint
D) Jurisdiction stripping
Correct Answer: C
The text defines judicial restraint as the assertion that 'judicial review should be constrained to decisions that adhere to current Constitutional and case precedent.' Deferring to elected branches and upholding precedent are hallmarks of this philosophy.
A) Impeach the justices who were in the majority.
B) Pass new legislation to clarify or modify the law.
C) Veto the Supreme Court's decision.
D) Order the president to ignore the ruling.
Correct Answer: B
The content explicitly lists 'Congressional legislation to modify the impact of prior Supreme Court decisions' as a restriction on the Supreme Court's power. This is a direct legislative check on judicial interpretation.
A) The president delaying implementation of a decision.
B) The Senate's refusal to confirm a judicial nominee.
C) The ratification of a Constitutional amendment.
D) Congress passing legislation to limit the Court's jurisdiction.
Correct Answer: C
While other options are valid checks, the text identifies the 'Ratification of a Constitutional amendment' as a restriction. An amendment can directly overturn a Supreme Court's constitutional interpretation, making it the most enduring and authoritative check on the Court's power.
A) Judicial restraint
B) Judicial activism
C) Delayed implementation
D) The confirmation process
Correct Answer: B
The text defines judicial activism as the assertion that 'judicial review allows the courts to overturn current Constitutional and case precedent.' Overturning a long-standing precedent is a clear example of this philosophy.
A) Publicly criticizing the Court's decisions.
B) Issuing executive orders to counter Court rulings.
C) Appointing new justices who share their ideological views.
D) Requesting that Congress limit the Court's jurisdiction.
Correct Answer: C
The content highlights 'Judicial appointments and confirmations which may shift the ideological balance of the court' as a key check. Since justices serve for life, a president's appointments can shape the Court's decisions for decades.
A) ratify a Constitutional amendment.
B) delay implementation of a Supreme Court decision.
C) modify the impact of a prior Supreme Court decision.
D) limit the cases the Supreme Court can hear on appeal.
Correct Answer: D
This scenario is a direct example of the check described in the text as 'Enacting legislation to limit the cases the Supreme Court can hear on appeal by removing the court's jurisdiction over a case,' often referred to as jurisdiction stripping.
A) Judicial appointments and confirmations
B) Ratification of a Constitutional amendment
C) States delaying implementation of a Supreme Court decision
D) Congressional legislation to modify the decision's impact
Correct Answer: C
The Supreme Court relies on the executive branch and the states to enforce its rulings. The text identifies 'The president and states delaying implementation of a Supreme Court decision' as a restriction on the Court's power, which is precisely what happened after the Brown v. Board decision.
A) the process for confirming federal judges.
B) the proper role and power of the judiciary in a democracy.
C) the number of justices that should serve on the Supreme Court.
D) the types of cases the Supreme Court should be allowed to hear.
Correct Answer: B
The text frames the debate as one over 'differing interpretations of judicial review' and the Supreme Court's power. Judicial activism and restraint are philosophies about how judges should wield their power to interpret the Constitution and check other branches, which is a core question about the judiciary's role in a democratic system.
A) The president vetoes a bill passed by Congress.
B) The Senate confirms a new justice to the Supreme Court.
C) The Supreme Court declares a law unconstitutional.
D) A state governor refuses to implement a court order.
Correct Answer: B
The text lists 'Judicial appointments and confirmations' as a check on the Supreme Court. The Senate, which is part of the legislative branch, holds confirmation power over the president's judicial nominees, thereby checking the composition of the judiciary.
A) Congress and the states ratifying a new amendment to the Constitution.
B) The president and the Senate changing the Court's ideological composition through appointments.
C) The House of Representatives impeaching a justice for issuing an unpopular ruling.
D) Congress passing a law that changes the Court's appellate jurisdiction.
Correct Answer: C
The provided text lists amendments, appointments, implementation delays, and jurisdiction stripping as checks on the Court's power. While impeachment is a power Congress has over justices, it is for 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' not for policy disagreements or unpopular rulings. The text does not list it as a check on the Court's decisions.
A) The House of Representatives and the Senate
B) The President and the House of Representatives
C) The President and the Senate
D) The Senate and the state legislatures
Correct Answer: C
The text mentions 'Judicial appointments and confirmations' as a check. In the U.S. system, the President appoints (nominates) federal judges, and the Senate confirms them.
A) appointing new justices who are likely to overturn the precedent.
B) encouraging Congress to pass new legislation to modify the impact of the ruling.
C) formally vetoing the Supreme Court's written opinion.
D) advocating for a Constitutional amendment to regulate campaign finance.
Correct Answer: C
The text outlines several checks, including appointments, legislation, and amendments. However, the president has no power to veto a Supreme Court decision; the veto power applies only to legislation passed by Congress.