PrepGo

AP English Language and Composition Practice Quiz: Adjusting to new or opposing evidence

Written by AP Content Team, Verified for 2026 AP Exams, Last updated: May 2026

Test your understanding with short quizzes. This quiz has 10 questions to check your progress.

Question 1 of 10

A writer encounters a counterargument that has some valid points. Which of the following strategies involves acknowledging the merit of the opposing view before presenting a counter-response?

All Questions (10)

A writer encounters a counterargument that has some valid points. Which of the following strategies involves acknowledging the merit of the opposing view before presenting a counter-response?

A) Refutation

B) Confirmation Bias

C) Concession

D) Ad Hominem

Correct Answer: C

Concession is the rhetorical strategy of acknowledging a point made by the opposition. This can enhance the speaker's credibility by showing they are reasonable and have considered multiple perspectives before refuting the overall counterargument.

A student argues that school uniforms reduce bullying. They then find a credible study showing that while uniforms decrease clothing-based bullying, they have no effect on other forms of bullying. How should the student best adjust their original claim in response to this evidence?

A) Discard the study because it doesn't fully support their argument.

B) Revise their claim to state that school uniforms reduce *certain types* of bullying.

C) Strengthen their argument by only citing evidence that supports the original, broader claim.

D) Conclude that school uniforms are completely ineffective in addressing bullying.

Correct Answer: B

The new evidence provides nuance rather than a complete contradiction. The most academically honest and effective response is to revise the original claim to be more precise, acknowledging the specific impact of school uniforms as indicated by the new evidence.

A researcher is studying the effects of a new medication. They find an article on a popular health blog that praises the drug, but the article is sponsored by the drug's manufacturer. Which aspect of the evidence's credibility is most immediately called into question?

A) The publication date of the article.

B) The relevance of the article to the research question.

C) The potential for bias in the source.

D) The methodology used to gather the data.

Correct Answer: C

Sponsorship by the manufacturer creates a significant conflict of interest, which strongly suggests a potential for bias. The source may be motivated to present the drug in a favorable light, regardless of the actual evidence. This is the most critical credibility issue to consider first.

The act of directly proving an opposing argument to be false or incorrect through the use of logical reasoning and evidence is known as:

A) concession.

B) qualification.

C) refutation.

D) integration.

Correct Answer: C

This question asks for a direct definition. Refutation is the process of disproving an opposing argument. It is a key component of debate and persuasive writing, distinct from concession, which acknowledges a point, or qualification, which limits a claim.

An author argues that a specific historical event was caused solely by economic factors. A newly discovered diary from a key political figure of the era reveals that personal rivalries also played a significant role. Which of the following is the most academically sound way for the author to incorporate this new evidence?

A) Acknowledge the diary but dismiss it as anecdotal and irrelevant to the broader economic trends.

B) Add a footnote mentioning the diary but leave the main argument about economic causality unchanged.

C) Qualify the original conclusion to acknowledge that while economic factors were primary, personal rivalries were also a contributing cause.

D) Abandon the original argument entirely and write a new one focused only on the personal rivalries.

Correct Answer: C

Strong historical arguments account for complexity. The new evidence doesn't necessarily invalidate the economic argument but adds another layer. The best approach is to integrate the new information by qualifying the original claim, leading to a more nuanced and accurate thesis.

A student researching the benefits of organic food primarily seeks out and uses sources that confirm their pre-existing belief that organic food is healthier, while ignoring several large-scale studies that show negligible nutritional differences. This behavior is a classic example of:

A) effective refutation.

B) confirmation bias.

C) scholarly concession.

D) objective integration.

Correct Answer: B

Confirmation bias is the cognitive tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs. The student's selective use of evidence and disregard for opposing data is a clear demonstration of this bias.

According to the principles of strong argumentation, why is it important to acknowledge and address opposing evidence?

A) To make the paper longer and meet word count requirements.

B) To demonstrate the writer's intellectual superiority over their opponents.

C) To show awareness of different perspectives and increase the argument's credibility.

D) To confuse the reader with too many different viewpoints.

Correct Answer: C

Engaging with counterarguments and opposing evidence demonstrates that the writer has thoroughly considered the topic from multiple angles. This enhances their credibility (ethos) and strengthens the overall argument by showing it can withstand scrutiny.

A debater argues that implementing a four-day work week increases productivity. Their opponent presents a recent, peer-reviewed study from a reputable university showing a slight decrease in productivity in one specific industry. What is the debater's strongest response?

A) Accuse the opponent of using fake data without providing any evidence.

B) Ignore the study and repeat their original claim more forcefully.

C) Acknowledge the study's findings but argue that the results from one specific industry may not be generalizable to the entire economy.

D) Concede that their entire argument is wrong based on this single piece of evidence.

Correct Answer: C

The strongest response is to engage with the evidence thoughtfully. Acknowledging the study's validity (concession) while also pointing out its limitations (the scope is one industry) is a powerful form of rebuttal. It shows critical thinking and keeps the debate focused on the evidence.

A city council is debating a proposal to build a new highway, citing a 20-year-old traffic study predicting massive congestion. Opponents present new data from the last two years showing a decrease in car usage due to a rise in remote work. They also present a study from a neighboring city where a new highway induced more traffic, a phenomenon known as 'induced demand.' How should a council member who initially supported the highway best adjust their position in light of this new evidence?

A) Disregard the new data as it contradicts the original, foundational study for the project.

B) Insist that the old study is more reliable because it was conducted by well-known engineers.

C) Propose a motion to pause the project and commission a new, comprehensive traffic study that accounts for recent trends like remote work and the principle of induced demand.

D) Argue that the neighboring city's experience is irrelevant because every city is unique.

Correct Answer: C

This is the most responsible and evidence-based approach. The new evidence (remote work data, induced demand study) is highly relevant and credible, and it challenges the fundamental assumptions of the original proposal. Instead of ignoring it or making a hasty decision based on outdated information, the best course of action is to re-evaluate the situation by gathering updated, comprehensive data.

When a researcher adds a statement to their conclusion such as, 'While these findings are significant, they may only apply to the specific demographic studied and further research is needed to confirm their broader applicability,' they are...

A) refuting their own evidence.

B) demonstrating confirmation bias.

C) qualifying their conclusion.

D) revising their central claim.

Correct Answer: C

This statement acknowledges the limitations of the research and sets boundaries on the applicability of the findings. This is the definition of qualifying a conclusion. It is a key component of academic honesty and strong argumentation, as it avoids overgeneralization.