AP English Language and Composition Unit 7: Writing the Open Argument Essay Practice Exam

Assessment for Unit 7: Writing the Open Argument Essay

Estimated Time: 60 minutes

Exam Details

Questions: 18 total (17 multiple choice, 1 short answer)
Time: 60 minutes (recommended)
Topics Covered: Unit 7: Writing the Open Argument Essay
Format: Multiple Choice, Short Answer questions matching real exam difficulty
Scoring: Instant results with detailed explanations

A. Multiple-Choice Questions (17 Questions)

Select the one best answer for each question.

1. [Skill: 2.B | Topic: 7.1] A student is writing an argument essay about the impact of artificial intelligence on the creative workforce. Which of the following versions of the thesis statement best uses a qualifier to create a defensible, nuanced claim?

(A)Artificial intelligence will undoubtedly destroy the creative industry by replacing all human artists with algorithms.(B)While artificial intelligence poses a challenge to traditional artistic roles, it significantly enhances the creative process when used as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement.(C)Artificial intelligence is bad for artists because it steals their work and makes it harder for them to get paid.(D)The government must ban artificial intelligence immediately to save the jobs of hardworking graphic designers and writers.

2. [Skill: 7.A | Topic: 7.1] Read the following sentence from a student's draft on urban planning: 'Although high-density housing *often* creates more walkable neighborhoods, it can inadvertently strain local infrastructure if not accompanied by transit upgrades.' Which of the following best describes the function of the word 'often' in the sentence?

(A)It weakens the argument by suggesting the writer is unsure about the effects of high-density housing.(B)It shifts the focus of the argument from housing to transportation issues.(C)It limits the scope of the claim, acknowledging that walkability is a likely but not guaranteed outcome.(D)It contradicts the subsequent claim about infrastructure strain to create a paradox.

3. [Skill: 2.B | Topic: 7.1] Which of the following thesis statements most effectively presents an 'open' argument structure rather than a 'closed' list of reasons?

(A)Mandatory voting should be implemented in the United States because it increases civic engagement, ensures representation of minority groups, and reduces polarization.(B)To revitalize the democratic process, the United States must implement mandatory voting, prioritizing collective civic duty over individual apathy.(C)Mandatory voting is a controversial topic that has been debated by political scientists for decades without a clear resolution.(D)There are three main reasons to support mandatory voting: higher turnout, better government accountability, and increased legitimacy of laws.

4. [Skill: 4.B | Topic: 7.1] A student wants to revise the following claim to make it more precise and defensible given the complexity of the issue: 'Censorship is never justified in a free society.' Which revision best utilizes qualifiers to create a nuanced argument?

(A)Censorship is always wrong and has no place in any country that calls itself free.(B)While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, limited censorship may be justified in rare instances where public safety is demonstrably at risk.(C)Censorship is sometimes okay, but usually, it is something that people should avoid doing.(D)Society should reject censorship because it limits creativity, stops the spread of ideas, and gives the government too much power.

5. Questions 1–4 refer to the passage below. (1) Advocates for the expansion of urban highways often argue that the personal automobile represents the pinnacle of American liberty. (2) They contend that the ability to travel anywhere, at any time, without reliance on a schedule, is a fundamental freedom that must be preserved through the widening of lanes and the construction of more parking. (3) It is true that the car offers a specific type of flexibility that a train or bus cannot match, particularly for those living in rural areas or needing to transport heavy loads. (4) To deny the convenience of a personal vehicle in these specific instances would be disingenuous. (5) However, in the context of a dense metropolis, this 'freedom' is increasingly illusory. (6) The liberty to drive is negated by the tyranny of traffic congestion. (7) When thousands exercise their freedom simultaneously, the result is gridlock—a collective paralysis where no one is free to move. (8) Furthermore, the argument that replacing street parking with bike lanes kills local business has been refuted by study after study. (9) Data consistently shows that pedestrians and cyclists spend more money at local shops than drivers do, simply because they are moving at a pace that allows them to notice and access these businesses. (10) By clinging to a car-centric model, we are not protecting freedom; we are subsidizing inefficiency and prioritizing the storage of private machinery over the movement of people. In sentences 3 and 4, the author concedes that personal vehicles offer flexibility primarily to

(A)admit that public transportation is inherently flawed and unreliable in all contexts.(B)establish a common ground with opponents before challenging the application of their argument to urban settings.(C)suggest that rural drivers are the primary audience for the argument regarding urban planning.(D)abandon the main argument that cars cause congestion in favor of a more moderate position.

6. The author’s strategy of explicitly distinguishing between the 'theoretical' independence of driving and the 'actual' experience of gridlock serves to

(A)alienate readers who own cars by mocking their choices.(B)appeal to the audience’s emotions by describing the stress of driving.(C)expose a logical fallacy in the opposing viewpoint by contrasting idealization with reality.(D)concede that the opposing viewpoint is factually correct but morally wrong.

7. The following questions are based on a draft of a student essay about the changing role of public libraries. (1) In an age where a universe of information can be accessed with a single swipe on a smartphone, some argue that the brick-and-mortar public library is an artifact of the past. (2) However, to view the library merely as a warehouse for books is to misunderstand its modern function. (3) Today’s libraries have transformed into dynamic community hubs that address a critical need: the digital divide. (4) While high-speed internet is a staple in many households, a significant portion of the population remains disconnected, relying on libraries for essential online access. (5) A 2021 study indicated that nearly one-third of households with incomes below 30,000 dollars do not own a smartphone. (6) Additionally, libraries offer quiet spaces for reading, which is hard to find in a noisy city. (7) Beyond mere access, libraries provide the guidance necessary to navigate the digital landscape. (8) In a world awash with "fake news," librarians act as information first responders, teaching patrons how to evaluate sources and verify facts. In sentence 6 (reproduced below), the writer is considering deleting the sentence to strengthen the line of reasoning. "Additionally, libraries offer quiet spaces for reading, which is hard to find in a noisy city." Should the writer keep or delete this sentence?

(A)Keep it, because it provides a counterargument to the idea that libraries are obsolete by highlighting a traditional benefit.(B)Keep it, because it offers an additional reason why libraries are valuable community hubs.(C)Delete it, because it contradicts the claim that libraries are transforming into digital hubs.(D)Delete it, because it introduces a detail that does not support the paragraph's central line of reasoning regarding the digital divide.

8. The writer wants to support the claim in sentence 8 (librarians as information first responders) with a concrete example. Which of the following pieces of evidence would best strengthen the argument?

(A)A quote from a local librarian expressing frustration with the increasing amount of noise in the teen section.(B)A description of a "News Literacy" seminar offered by the library that teaches patrons how to cross-reference sources.(C)Statistics showing that library circulation of physical books has remained steady over the last decade despite the rise of e-books.(D)An anecdote about a patron who found a rare book in the stacks that was not available on any digital platform.

9. The writer is considering replacing the general phrase "a significant portion of the population" in sentence 4 with the specific phrase "over 20 million American households." Which of the following best explains why this change would strengthen the line of reasoning?

(A)It provides a concrete quantity that emphasizes the scale of the issue, making the need for libraries appear more urgent.(B)It uses emotional language to appeal to the audience's sense of sympathy for disconnected families.(C)It narrows the scope of the argument to focus only on American households rather than a global audience.(D)It serves as a transition to the statistical evidence provided in the subsequent sentence regarding smartphone usage.

10. The writer is reviewing the following sentence from the second paragraph of an essay arguing for the adoption of a four-day workweek: 'Research proves that every employee is more productive when they work fewer hours, so businesses will see immediate profit increases.' The writer wants to modify this claim to make it more defensible and accurate. Which version of the sentence best achieves this goal?

(A)Research proves that no employee can maintain productivity over five days, so businesses are guaranteed to see profit increases.(B)Research suggests that many employees in knowledge-based sectors may be more productive with reduced hours, potentially leading to profit increases for those businesses.(C)Research proves that employees are always more productive when they work fewer hours, although businesses might not see immediate profit increases.(D)Research suggests that every employee is more productive when they work fewer hours, and businesses will definitely see profit increases.

11. The writer is working on a paragraph arguing that a four-day workweek reduces burnout. However, the writer has encountered new evidence indicating that some employees report increased stress due to having to complete the same amount of work in fewer days. Which of the following adjustments to the line of reasoning would best incorporate this counterevidence while maintaining the writer's central argument?

(A)Dismissing the new evidence as an anomaly and continuing to argue that a four-day workweek eliminates stress for all workers.(B)Deleting the paragraph about burnout entirely and focusing solely on the environmental benefits of commuting one day less.(C)Conceding that a condensed schedule requires better time management, but arguing that the extra day of rest ultimately provides a net benefit for mental health.(D)Changing the thesis to argue that the five-day workweek is actually superior because it spreads the workload out more evenly.

12. In the conclusion of the essay, the writer wants to add a sentence that acknowledges the financial concerns of business owners regarding the transition to a four-day workweek. Which sentence best establishes a concession while pivoting back to support the main argument?

(A)Business owners who worry about the costs of a shorter workweek are ignoring the clear data that shows they are wrong.(B)While the transition to a four-day workweek may present initial logistical and financial challenges for employers, the long-term reduction in turnover costs offers a compelling return on investment.(C)There are significant financial concerns for business owners, and therefore the four-day workweek should only be implemented on a volunteer basis.(D)Employers will save money on electricity and maintenance by keeping the office closed on Fridays.

13. The writer is revising the thesis statement to make it more nuanced. Original Thesis: 'Mandating a four-day workweek is the only way to save the economy and cure the mental health crisis.' Revised Thesis: 'Implementing a four-day workweek in suitable industries offers a promising approach to revitalizing economic productivity and alleviating widespread workforce burnout.' What is the primary effect of this revision on the argument's defensibility?

(A)It broadens the scope of the argument to include all possible solutions to economic issues.(B)It shifts the focus from mental health to purely economic indicators.(C)It limits the claim's scope and replaces absolute language with qualified terms, making the argument harder to disprove.(D)It makes the argument less persuasive by admitting that the solution might not work for everyone.

14. The following questions are based on a draft of an essay about the role of handwriting in the digital age. The writer wants to revise sentence 1 (reproduced below) to provide a more engaging hook that establishes the specific context of the argument. 'In today’s world, keyboards are used for almost everything.' Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?

(A)It is a truth universally acknowledged that computers have become the dominant tool for communication in the modern era.(B)While the rapid integration of digital technology in education promises efficiency, it has inadvertently sparked a debate regarding the cognitive costs of abandoning analog tools.(C)People type on their phones, tablets, and laptops more than they ever write on paper, which is a big change from the past.(D)Keyboards are everywhere, from offices to classrooms, and they have changed the way we produce text in significant ways.

15. The writer wants to revise sentence 3 (reproduced below) to create a defensible thesis that establishes a clear line of reasoning. 'However, cursive writing is important and should be kept in schools because it helps students learn better.' Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?

(A)However, schools should not abandon handwriting instruction, as the physical act of writing aids memory retention and supports complex cognitive development.(B)However, writing by hand is a beautiful art form that connects us to history, so schools should definitely make sure every student learns it.(C)Therefore, even though typing is faster, handwriting is better for students who want to get good grades and remember things for tests.(D)However, the debate over handwriting is complex, with many educators arguing for its removal while others fight to keep it in the curriculum.

16. The writer wants to revise the first sentence of the conclusion (reproduced below) to better synthesize the previous arguments about cognitive retention and motor skills, rather than merely summarizing them. 'In the end, typing is faster, but writing is better.' Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?

(A)To conclude, while typing offers speed, handwriting offers quality, making it the superior choice for students.(B)Ultimately, the convenience of digital transcription cannot replace the unique neurological connections forged by the tactile resistance of pen against paper.(C)As shown in the paragraphs above, writing by hand helps you remember things and builds motor skills, so it is better than typing.(D)Finally, schools must choose between the speed of the future and the methods of the past, and they should choose the past.

17. The writer wants to revise the final sentence of the essay (reproduced below) to provide a sense of finality and explain the broader significance of the argument. 'If we stop writing by hand, we might lose a skill that is actually very useful for our brains.' Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?

(A)If we stop writing by hand, we will likely regret it later when we realize that our brains are not working as well as they used to.(B)Preserving handwriting in the curriculum is, therefore, not an act of nostalgia, but a necessary safeguard for deep, critical thinking in an increasingly automated world.(C)So, keep your pencils sharp and your notebooks open, because writing by hand is a skill that is here to stay.(D)The loss of handwriting would be a tragedy for education, so teachers must ensure that this vital skill is never forgotten by future generations.

B. Short Answer Questions (1 Question)

Answer all parts of each question. Answers must be in essay form. Outlines or lists alone are not acceptable.

Question 18:

加载中...