加载中...
加载中...
Assessment for Unit 5: Style and Rhetorical Choices
Select the one best answer for each question.
1. Questions 1–4 refer to the passage below. “There is a time in every man's education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better for worse as his portion; that though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried. Not for nothing one face, one character, one fact, makes much impression on him, and another none. This sculpture in the memory is not without preestablished harmony. The eye was placed where one ray should fall, that it might testify of that particular ray. We but half express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of us represents. It may be safely trusted as proportionate and of good issues, so it be faithfully imparted, but God will not have his work made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put his heart into his work and done his best; but what he has said or done otherwise shall give him no peace. It is a deliverance which does not deliver. In the attempt his genius deserts him; no muse befriends; no invention, no hope.” In the first sentence of the passage (“There is a time . . . to till”), the author uses a series of parallel clauses introduced by “that” primarily to
2. [Skill: 7.A | Topic: 5.2] The following questions are based on the excerpt below: 'Ideally, the law serves as a shield, protecting the vulnerable from the caprices of power; however, it can easily become a sword, striking down the very liberties it was designed to uphold. When the state, in its eagerness to enforce order, disregards the inherent rights of the individual, it transforms justice into oppression. We must remain vigilant, not because we mistrust our leaders, but because we value our freedom. Only through constant scrutiny can we ensure that the heavy hand of authority does not crush the fragile spirit of democracy.' In the first sentence ('Ideally... uphold'), the writer uses a semicolon and the conjunctive adverb 'however' to link two independent clauses. This structural choice primarily serves to:
3. [Skill: 7.A | Topic: 5.2] In the second sentence ('When the state... oppression'), the writer's decision to place the subordinate clause 'When the state... individual' before the main clause serves to:
4. [Skill: 7.A | Topic: 5.2] In the third sentence ('We must... freedom'), the writer uses the antithetical structure 'not because... but because...' to:
5. Questions 1–4 refer to the following passage. 'Civilization is not a wild forest that grows according to the chaotic whims of nature; it is a garden that requires the constant, manicured attention of its keepers. If we neglect the soil of education, how can we expect the fruits of innovation? If we ignore the weeds of injustice, how can we be surprised when they choke the blossoms of peace? We do not blame the storm for the ruin of the house; we blame the builder who neglected the roof. Similarly, we cannot blame history for our present failures; we must look to our own hands, our own choices, and our own resolve.' In the first sentence ('Civilization is not... of its keepers'), the writer compares civilization to a garden primarily to
6. The writer uses parallel rhetorical questions in the second and third sentences ('If we neglect... blossoms of peace?') primarily to
7. Which of the following best describes the effect of the parallel structure in the final sentence ('we must look to our own hands, our own choices, and our own resolve')?
8. Questions 1–4 refer to the following excerpt from a speech by Ida B. Wells, titled 'Lynch Law in America' (1900). 'It is not the creature of an hour, the sudden outburst of uncontrolled fury, or the unspeakable brutality of an insane mob. It represents the cool, calculating deliberation of intelligent people who openly avow that there is an "unwritten law" that justifies them in putting human beings to death without complaint under oath, without trial by jury, without opportunity to make defense, and without right of appeal.' In the first sentence ('It is not... insane mob'), the author uses the phrases 'creature of an hour' and 'sudden outburst' primarily to
9. In the second sentence, the author's use of a parallel series of phrases beginning with 'without' ('without complaint... without trial... without opportunity... without right') functions to
10. The author's description of the perpetrators as 'intelligent people who openly avow' contributes to a tone that is best described as
11. The writer wants to revise sentence 1 (reproduced below) to reduce redundancy and improve concision without losing the original meaning. 'In the modern era of today, it is widely acknowledged by many experts that our attention spans are shrinking rapidly.' Which version of the sentence best achieves this goal?
12. The writer wants to revise sentence 3 (reproduced below) to eliminate a dangling modifier and clarify the relationship between the action and the actor. 'By constantly checking our phones, the ability to concentrate on complex tasks is diminished.' Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?
13. The writer wants to combine sentences 5 and 6 (reproduced below) to improve the flow and sophistication of the argument. 'To combat this, some advocate for "digital minimalism," a philosophy that encourages intentional technology use. It is a method that is effective.' Which version of the combined sentence best achieves this purpose?
14. The writer is considering revising sentence 2 (reproduced below) to create a more urgent and critical tone regarding the impact of technology. 'Constant notifications and the endless scroll of social media feeds have created an environment where deep focus is becoming a rare commodity.' Which version of the sentence best achieves this rhetorical effect?